news

Posted on February 5, 2013 March 9, 10 & 11: Voices of Fukushima Last year, hundreds of us created a mock evacuation from Vemont Yankee, to honor the Fukushima evacuees. The heart breaking stories from the Fukushima nuclear evacuees continue. This year, we are taking to our own town greens, farmers markets, and street corners to say: Fukushimna ghost towns could be our own towns. Six towns are adopting a Fukushima sister city for a day and will share the evacuation stories that are being suppressed by the corporate media. Putney, Brattleboro, Northfield, Greenfield, Wendall, Amherst and Hanover, NH will have events on Saturday or Sunday. If you’d like to create a Voices of Fukushima event for your town, or want to connect with plans in progress, email safeandgreencampaign@gmail.com. Ideas for events, a map, and descriptions of towns are all on our Voices of Fukushima pages ONE PAGE BOTH Fukushima Flyer In addition to events throughout the region, at 11:00am on Sunday, March 10th a solemn vigil at the gates of Vermont Yankee in Vernon will be hosted by the SAGE Alliance to honor the second anniversary. DON’T WASTE OUR TIME Saturday, March 30: Leaks, Lies and Lawyers! Soon, a year will have gone by since Entergy’s VT Yankee reactor went rogue on March 21, 2012. What has a year brought us? Nothing but WASTE! WASTE of taxpayer money defending Vermont from FOUR new lawsuits by Entergy, plus two appeals. WASTE of time that could have been spent on safely decommissioning the reactor. WASTE of another year — now 7 years! – without a Clean Water Act permit. Another year of heating up the Connecticut River and boiling the fish, during one of the hottest summers on record. Another year of radioactive WASTE in the already over-crowded spent fuel pool. And in February Entergy announced that it is going to refuel — meaning MORE nuclear waste into the fuel pool, meaning they are ignoring the promise they made in the sale agreement to stop generating and storing nuclear waste after March 21, 2012. We will not sit back and let Entergy’s high priced lawyers decide our energy future! We will gather at 3:30pm at the Harris Place parking area in Brattleboro on March 30. We’ll parade through downtown Brattleboro, led by Bread & Puppet, with floats, banners and bands, to the Latchis Theatre at 4:30pm for a program of speakers, skits and music. Start imagining your parade contribution, then get busy recruiting friends and building your float, creating a banner, or rehearsing a song. For more information or to volunteer Voices of Fukushima, or Leaks, Lies & Lawyers, email safeandgreencampaign@gmail.com and we’ll put your in contact with the events’ organizers. Posted in Affinity Groups, Events, SAGE Alliance | Tagged Affinity Groups, anti-nuclear, Safe and Green Campaign, SAGE Alliance, Vermont Yankee Nuclear | Comments Off VT’s Evacuation Plan Posted on January 30, 2013 The letter below, by the Safe and Green Campaign, was co-signed by 80 citizens who live in the shadow of Vermont Yankee. You can read the full letter here on our Action page. Vermont Emergency Management has a website for the Vermont’s Radiological Emergency Response plan here. Dear Governor Shumlin, Thank you for your efforts to protect Vermonters from the hazards created by the operation of Vermont Yankee and the unscrupulous business practices of Entergy Corporation. In 2010, we delivered into your hands a petition signed by 1,656 residents living within 20 miles of Vermont Yankee. Our petition said, in part, “We are tired of being asked to believe that evacuation plans will actually work. We ask that you imagine hearing the evacuation sirens go off and knowing that you will be separated from your children, that roads will be clogged, that there will be panic. “ It has been brought to our attention that, as Governor, you are required to sign a letter approving the state evacuation plan for Vermont Yankee by January 31st. We write to ask you not to sign off on the current Radiological Emergency Response Plan. 1. The American Red Cross studied the plan and in testimony to the Vermont State Nuclear Advisory Panel in September “concluded that, at present, there is a significant gap between what the Plan calls for and what the Red Cross can reasonably provide in the way of material equipment and shelter staffing.” The Red Cross is also concerned that it cannot handle the number of evacuees anticipated at shelters. 2. As the Fukushima disaster has proven, shelter for long-term displaced populations must be taken into account. The plan does not address the impacts on outlying areas for housing refugees. 3. Plans for evacuating our most vulnerable populations, including after school, family day care, and elder day care programs, are non-existent. 4. Hurricane Irene has shown us that our roads, bridges, and power lines can be completely incapacitated by a disaster. If Vermont Yankee were to suffer a loss of power or damage to its spent fuel pool during a natural disaster – a not unlikely scenario — getting to the reactor, as well as driving out of the evacuation zone, could prove to be impossible. This is true even when there is no disaster and simple routine bridge maintenance is being done, as has been the case in Windham County during the past two years; traffic is often dramatically slowed miles south of Brattleboro. 5. Fukushima has also shown us the danger of the spent fuel pool. According to the Rutland Herald (January 4, 2013), “Currently, there are 2,507 fuel assemblies stored on site at the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant in Vernon in its five-story spent fuel pool, with another 884 fuel assemblies in 13 concrete and steel casks outside the reactor building.” Please advocate for the immediate removal of fuel rods in the spent fuel pool into dry casks. Prior to 1987, if a Governor refused to sign off on an evacuation plan, then the nuclear reactor’s license would be jeopardized. In 1983, Governor Mario Cuomo refused to sign an evacuation plan for Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant, another GE boiling water reactor like Vermont Yankee; it was later decommissioned. In 1987, Governor Dukakis refused to sign off on Seabrook’s evacuation plan, and Ohio Gov. Richard F. Celeste withdrew approval for evacuation plans for the Perry and Davis-Besse nuclear power facilities. Then the NRC changed the rules: reactor owners now draft evacuation plans, which the NRC approves. In an attempt to save Seabrook and Shoreham, President Ronald Reagan signed an executive order that “authorizes federal officials to prepare, coordinate and contribute federal resources to evacuation plans for nuclear plants where local and state governments have refused to cooperate with utility efforts.” U.S. Congressman Edward Markey has studied the role of the federal government in a nuclear accident. None of the federal agencies wants responsibility for oversight. According to Rep. Markey’s website: “DHS is responsible for coordinating Federal operations within the United States to prepare for, respond to, and recover from terrorist attacks, major disasters, and other emergencies.’ Yet the plan also indicates that, depending on the type of nuclear or radiological incident, the coordinating agency may instead be the Department of Energy, Department of Defense, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), or the U.S. Coast Guard.” We cannot depend on the federal government to know what to do. As Governor Madeline Kunin said a year ago, “Governors have the responsibility to protect the safety of their citizens. If the plant accidentally releases radiation, the Governor takes immediate action, ordering an evacuation, issuing iodine pills.” The safety of Windham County is in your hands, Governor Shumlin. We call on you to refuse to sign a letter approving a plan that is doomed to fail. Sincerely, [80 concerned citizens] cc: Emergency Management Directors ( for Brattleboro, Dummerston, Guilford, Halifax, Marlboro) Windham County Legislative Delegation Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged anti-nuclear, evacuation plan, Safe and Green Campaign, Vermont Yankee Nuclear | Comments Off Eyewitness Report from Fukushima Posted on January 12, 2013 Chiho Kaneko 2012 web formatThe Safe and Green Campaign is honored to host Chiho Kaneko once again, for a slide show presentation from her recent trip to Fukushima, Japan. She will speak at 7:00 pm on Tuesday, January 22 in the Parlor of the Center Congregational Church in Brattleboro. The event is free; donations to defray the costs are gratefully accepted. Read more here. Chiho spoke with families, workers, and activists, to learn first hand the ongoing impact of the catastrophic nuclear reactor meltdowns that followed the March 11, 2o11 earthquake an tsunami. This will be Ms. Kaneko’s second presentation in Brattleboro. In March 2012, she gave a moving presentation to an audience of 300 people gathered at the River Garden to commemorate the one year anniversary of the Fukushima disaster. The Commons published her 2012 presentation in full, here. The event is sponsored by the Safe & Green Campaign, and is being held to honor the memory of Martin Luther King, Jr. Through our scientific and technological genius, we have made of this world a neighborhood and yet we have not had the ethical commitment to make of it a brotherhood. But somehow, and in some way, we have got to do this. We must all learn to live together as brothers or we will all perish together as fools. We are tied together in the single garment of destiny, caught in an inescapable network of mutuality. And whatever affects one directly affects all indirectly. –Martin Luther King, Jr., Remaining Awake Through A Great Revolution Posted in Events | Tagged anti-nuclear, Safe and Green Campaign | Comments Off Trouble Ahead, Trouble Behind Posted on January 3, 2013 Danziger cartoonDon’t retire those “Nuclear Free in 2012″ lawn signs. While 2012 has come to a close, and Vermont Yankee is still producing tons of radioactive waste, the new year’s winds are in our favor. In today’s blog post titled “Vermont Yankee – Worth More Dead than Alive” Conservation Law Foundation attorney Sandy Levine writes, “Financial analysts report that Vermont Yankee is economically vulnerable and a retirement announcement would boost stock prices for its parent, Entergy.” Read her blog, with a link to the analysts’ UBS Investment Research report here. Statement of Risk on Page 6 is especially interesting — first because it is written in English, not finance-ese; and second, it describes the additional non-financial risks which make Entergy a poor bargain in Wall Street’s eyes- from regulatory pressures to weather to the price of uranium to “headline risk” — their euphemism for a nuclear accident (!). In today’s news, the Public Service Board (PSB) put out a second order, once again affirming that Yankee is operating in violation of its sale agreement and lacks a Certificate of Public Good. Their orders rely on language in the 2002 Sale Order Entergy signed. Condition 8 of the Sale Order states: 8. Absent issuance of a new Certificate of Public Good or renewal of the Certificate of Public Good issued today, Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. are prohibited from operating the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station after March 21, 2012. Motivated by the PSB’s orders, the New England Coalition has gone to the Vermont Supreme Court asking that Yankee be shut down because they are in violation of the sale order. Entergy claims NEC is using bad process, and the state is worried that yet another court battle will muck up the works. The Supremes will hear oral arguments in Montpelier on January 16. Just two days earlier in New York City, the Federal Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments from Entergy’s stable of four law firms and the Vermont Attorney General’s office in the “preemption case.” Entergy argued that Act 160, the law the legislature enacted giving itself a say in whether nuclear plants can be permitted to operate by the PSB, was motivated by safety concerns. Only the NRC can judge radiological safety. The state argues that Act 160 says nothing about safety, and that the case should be decided on what the law says. States are watching the case carefully, as a decision in favor of Entergy could undermine the authority of legislatures. The decision in this case “could have dramatic implications for state sovereignty and the ability of legislatures to regulate corporate activities within their borders.” Read more here, for an excellent analysis of states rights in this case. As the song goes, trouble ahead, trouble behind …. for Entergy these days. Way to start a new year! Posted in Legal | Comments Off UPDATED: PSB Gives Entergy a Dope Slap Posted on December 1, 2012 12.4.12 UPDATE : Today the New England Coalition asked the VT Supreme Court to order Entergy to shut down Vermont Yankee. They want Yankee to “immediately cease and desist from nuclear power generation” until the PSB decides whether or not to grant them a certificate of public good. Why now? The PSB Order earlier this week (see below) gave the Coalition the opportunity. The Coalition says that by operating after 3.21.12 Entergy is violating the Sale agreement to shut down March 21st. Yes, we activists have been saying this same thing for well over a year now. The wheels of justice turn slowly. In their “Complaint for Injunctive Relief”, the Coalition asked the VT Supreme Court to expedite their decision. Let us hope the Coalition succeeds, and we who live in the evacuation zone get some relief! You can read the Coalition’s complaint on their website: www.newenglandcoalition.org/ For the PSB’s Order, scroll down to November 29 on their page of Recent PSB Orders [11.29.12] The Public Service Board dope slapped Entergy in a 30 page Order this week. It’s exactly the dope slap the Car Talk guys would give to a teenaged driver, “Whack! Ya Dummy!” In the 2002 Sale Order made when Entergy bought the reactor, it promised it wouldn’t operate past March 21, 2012 except to decommission, and it wouldn’t store any new fuel on site after March 21 either. On May 29th, 2012 some bright Entergy lawyer asked the PSB to change the Sale Order, since they’d been in violation for a couple months. Entergy’s brief says “Geez, this is a huge surprise! We are shocked that we do not have a CPG by now! How could we have known? It’s all the legislature’s fault for slowing us down with that Senate voting thing. It’s really hard on us not to know what’s going to happen!” The PSB was not amused. Of course, they say it politely (at first): “…the conditions at issue should not have been a surprise to Entergy VY. Instead, we find that Entergy VY has shown no reason to have expected any other outcome. We also conclude that, although we recognize that the legislature took actions that changed the legal landscape, Entergy VY’s claimed hardship — the risks associated with operation after the deadline for termination set out in Condition 8 of the Sale Order [3.21.12 closure] — is in large part the result of tactical decisions Entergy VY made concerning legislative strategy, the timing of legal challenges, and the structure of its petition to the Board.” In other words: its your own bad choices, kid. Whack! Ya Dummy. And that’s just page 2. The PSB then goes on for another 28 pages rubbing it in. They say “you should have known” in every conceivable way. They spend five pages reminding Entergy of the Board’s power. They quote Entergy’s own attorneys and witnesses. They say it was your choice to sue the State of Vermont, and to wait 5 years after Act 160 was passed to do so. It was your choice to make “misstatements concerning underground pipes” bringing the whole case to a screeching halt. You asked us once before if you could run after March 21, and on March 19th we said no. “At that point, Entergy VY could have avoided hardship by complying with the Board’s Order … Instead, it voluntarily elected to continue operating Vermont Yankee… Any hardship Entergy VY faces is the result of choices it made…” In other words — you could have just shut down. And if you thought we’d let you keep on running, why didn’t you say so? We aren’t going to accuse you of hiding anything. You were being up front with us when you bought the place, weren’t you? Or, in lawyer speak: “… we would have to assume that Entergy’s witnesses and the representations in its briefs contained unstated caveats that effectively altered the meaning of the commitments. We decline to conclude that Entergy VY would fail to apprise the Board of material limitations on its commitments in 2002 when it was seeking approval for the sale transactions. Instead, we presume that Entergy VY’s 2002 representations were accurate. And we relied upon them in issuing the Sale Order. One would never want to accuse a quasi-judicial body of being snide. Or sarcastic. But one could read both into the quote above. They conclude: … we do expect that Entergy VY’s compliance with our Orders and its willingness to abide by affirmative commitments in testimony and briefs will be relevant considerations in any decision the Board makes concerning modification of Entergy VY’s existing CPGs. Entergy is now on notice that their past behavior will be taken into account when the PSB decides on their Certificate of Public Good. Whack! AP Article Rutland Herald article VY is in a Tight Box – CLF Blog Posted in Legal | Comments Off Wrapping Up November Posted on November 28, 2012 Heads Up! VT State Nuclear Advisory Panel (VSNAP) is holding a meeting from 6-9pm on Thursday, November 29 in the MultiPurpose Room at Brattleboro Union High School. On the agenda: permits for thermal pollution — 5 1/2 years delayed in the Agency of Natural Resources. The state geologist will also be on hand. 55 minutes at the end of the meeting have been reserved for public comment. SUNDAY DECEMBER 2nd marks the birth of the atomic age in 1942 and the 35th birthday of the first civilian nuclear power reactor. REFUSE THE BIRTHDAY GIFT OF NUCLEAR WASTE! 10:00 AM VIGIL at the gate of VT Yankee in Vernon, the Sunflower Brigade affinity group invites you to a vigil to mark the occasion of the birth of nuclear power. Dress in black. 11:00 AM SAGE Spokes Council. On the agenda: what’s next for the SAGE Alliance? 139 Main Street, conference room, Brattleboro. 3:00 PM: Open House at New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution, 139 Main Street, above conference room. UPDATE on Entergy’s application before the Public Service Board: according to the New England Coalition (NEC), on the day before Thanksgiving, Entergy filed to have all issues relating to thermal pollution excluded. They also filed to exclude the testimony of NEC’s expert witness Ray Shadis and a host of issues raised by Conservation Law Foundation and VT Dept of Public Service. Those parties have until December 21 to respond. Success! Thanks to many of you, the Public Service Board hearings statewide were packed on November 19th. Just like on November 7th, the PSB did not make the time to listen to all the people who signed up to speak. The hearing rooms in Springfield, Montpelier, White River, and Brattleboro were packed to overflowing, and there were people at all 13 sites saying, in their own carefully chosen words, “NO CPG.” Prof. Steve Chase of Antioch counted 68 saying shut Yankee down, and 25 said keep it going. At least ten people who signed up to speak never got the chance. The public can still write comments, and some writers say they are demanding another public hearing, as everyone has the right to be heard. The Rutland Herald covered the hearings here: http://www.vermonttoday.com/ Courtesy of VYDA, we have artsy, bright yellow post cards saying NO CPG! addressed to the PSB, with or without text. Let state regulators know Entergy’s VT Yankee has not earned a Certificate of Public Good. Email safeandgreen@gmail.com if you’d like us to mail you some postcards to distribute. A big shout out to Harvey Schaktman of CAN for filming our VY & the PSB Dinner Forum on Nov. 5th, and getting the tape up on 17 community access television stations. The Forum helped prep people statewide for the 19th. Thanks to all who came with ideas, questions and actions. (Fabulous dinner, too!) Local papers are still publishing two “YES VY!” for every argument we write. Feel free to pass them on to Safe & Green to post on our website letters. Thanks to all who have been writing letters to the editor of late, including Betsy Williams, Dan DeWalt, Steve Chase and Nikki Sauber about the PSB hearings. Andy Larkin wrote recently on Hurricane Sandy & nukes: http://mobile.gazettenet.com/opinion/2691082-108/nuclear-plants-fuel-grid Thanks for all you do to say YES to clean, safe and reliable energy! Posted in Action, Events, SAGE Alliance | Tagged Safe and Green Campaign, SAGE Alliance, Vermont Yankee Nuclear | Comments Off PSB Updates & Actions Posted on November 15, 2012 New! CAN has written up “9 GOOD REASONS” for the PSB to deny Entergy a certificate of public good – none of which touch upon radiological health and safety. New! Shout Out to all Banneristas! Grab your banners and head to Vermont’s capitol city this Saturday for the RALLY & MARCH: Vermont’s Energy is Vermont’s Choice. 12:30 pm — gather at the City Hall, Main Street then we’ll march to the State House with our banners. Read more about Saturday’s MARCH & RALLY on VPIRG’s website here Link to PSB Docket 7862 page, PSB Hearings: Overview and Basic Information, and Safe & Green Notes from the PSB & VY Forum 11/5 in Brattleboro. Posted in Action, Events | Tagged anti-nuclear, Safe and Green Campaign, SAGE Alliance, Vermont Yankee Nuclear | Comments Off 11/19 PSB Outreach & 11/7 PSB Critique Posted on November 10, 2012 Despite AP and local press reports to the contrary, those opposed to the 20 year license extension of Vermont Yankee were well-represented at the Public Service Board hearing in Vernon on Nov. 5th. Nikki Sauber kept a tally: “…of the 73 total speakers, 39 members of the public, most of them employees at Vermont Yankee, spoke in favor of granting Vermont Yankee a twenty-year extension; 34 members of the public, none of whom worked for the company, spoke against granting the extension.‘” Read Nikki’s excellent letter to the editor here. We have another bite at the bad apple, on November 19th at 7pm. Read our November 5th post below for details. This time the PSB is taking comments from locations of VT Interactive t.v. sites throughout the state. Bring some friends, and make your position clear to the PSB. 65 folks came to our Dinner Forum to prep and make phone calls, and do some brainstorming. Click here for Notes and additional resources from 11-15-12 Safe and Green Dinner & Forum We have more phone lists, this time from Chittenden County and the far north. If you would like to make some calls, email safeandgreencampaign@gmail.com Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off PSB Hearings Nov. 7 & 19 Posted on November 5, 2012 Nov. 7th THE HEARING IS STILL ON, per the PSB website http://psb.vermont.gov/ PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD HEARINGS 11/7 & 11/19, 2012 Vermont’s Public Service Board will decide if Entergy receives permission to continue operating in Vermont for another 20 years. The process starts this November with Public Hearings on the “right of Entergy to continue to operate Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power station” and store waste. You can see the schedule and all the testimony and orders for the case at the PSB here: http://psb.vermont.gov/docketsand%20projects/electric/7862 (Check that link and/or their home page to see if the weather has forced a postponement of a PSB hearing). There are only TWO public hearings scheduled. DATES: November 7th, Wednesday: 7:00 pm, Vernon Elementary School, Vernon: The PSB will take comments from the public in person. Doors open at 6:30 pm. Sign up to comment. November 19th, Monday, 7:00pm: The PSB will take comments from the public via Vermont Interactive Television at a dozen locations throughout Vermont. (listed below). Entergy invited all current and former employees to a meeting to prepare them to make public comments at the PSB hearings. They will turn out in force. We need to pack these hearings with people who believe that Yankee must not be permitted to continue operating, and that it be safely decommissioned as soon as possible. Public Service Board’s guidelines on public comments: - comments do not become part of the evidentiary record but do “play an important role by raising new issues or offering perspectives that the Board should consider and ask parties to present evidence on.” - There is usually a sign up sheet for individuals who wish to speak– so GET THERE EARLY and SIGN UP. - The time allotted for each individual to speak may be short – make your comments concise – you may only have a minute or two. - If you live in NH or Mass., the Public Service Board does allow comments from non-Vermont residents. - Please contact your friends and colleagues and urge them to come and comment. Click here for Notes and additional resources from 11-15-12 Safe and Green Dinner & Forum WHAT CAN WE TALK ABOUT? PSB: “…we may consider any non-radiological-health-and-safety matters that bear upon the general good of the state and that do not directly conflict with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s exercise of its federal jurisdiction or frustrate the purposes of federal regulation.” Here are a few suggestions on comments: - Entergy cannot be trusted. Since Entergy bought Yankee in 2002, they have lied to us, broken agreements made when they bought the reactor (MOU). - Cooling tower collapse and cover-up, and lies to PSB and legislators – they cannot be trusted. - NINE slow-downs in 2012 alone to make repairs– not a reliable source of power. - They are not good business partners. Entergy sued the state of VT this year alone, (1) demanding we pay $4.6million in legal fees for federal preemption case and (2) over VT’s right to tax it (promptly dismissed). - We do not need (or want) the power. - Yankee reduces our market competitiveness and ability to create jobs in conservation, efficiency, and renewable energy. - Thermal discharge – sending heated water into the Connecticut River pollutes the water and hurts the aquatic life. - We want Yankee decommissioned safely, now, to greenfield condition. - Nuclear energy is not in the state’s electric plan. - YOUR REASONS HERE: _____________ - Opening and Closing Message to PSB: Deny Certificate of Public Good to Entergy. Vermont Interactive Technology sites for PSB public hearing on Monday, November 19 beginning at 7:00pm: Bennington Senior Citizens’ Service Center, 124 Pleasant Street Brattleboro Brattleboro Union High School, 131 Fairground Road – Room 125 Johnson Johnson State College, Bentley Hall – Room 211 Lyndonville Lyndon State College, 1001 College Road Middlebury Hannaford Career Center, 51 Charles Avenue – 2nd Floor Montpelier Vermont Department of Labor, 5 Green Mountain Drive Newport North Country Union High School, 209 Veterans Avenue Randolph Center Vermont Technical College, VIT Studio – Morrill Hall Rutland Stafford Technical Center, 8 Stratton Road – Room 108 Springfield Howard Dean Education Center, 307 South Street – 2nd Floor St. Albans Bellows Free Academy, 4 Hospital Drive White River Jct. Community College of Vermont, CCV Upper Valley, 145 Billings Farm Road Williston Blair Park, 451 Lawrence Place How VIT works – for more info, go to www.vitlink.org/ “There is a monitor, which shows one of the remote sites in your session. You will see your own studio on another monitor. You can only see one (1) remote site at a time. But it automatically switches to the site from which a person is speaking. If someone has a question or comment, you will hear the voice immediately. Within a few seconds, the video on the monitors at all the sites will automatically switch so that the person who is speaking can be seen.” You can file your comments on paper. Send them to: Clerk of the Board Vermont Public Service Board 112 State Street Montpelier, VT 05620-2701 Reference “Vermont Yankee Re-licensing” or Docket #7862 You can also email comments to: psb.clerk@state.vt.us . Subject line: Vermont Yankee Re-licensing, or Docket #7862. You can send in your comments, or both speak at a hearing and write comments to send in. Posted in Action, Events | Tagged anti-nuclear, Safe and Green Campaign, Vermont Yankee Nuclear | Comments Off Forum Postponed — Come Monday Nov. 5th Posted on October 28, 2012 Hurricane Sandy looks like it could be a big one, folks. We have decided to postpone our “VY and the PSB” Forum for a week. Join us Monday, Nov. 5th for the same dinner, speakers, and phone bank organizing as in the post below, location TBA. Entergy had a meeting this week to prep their employees for the PSB Hearing November 7th – we need to be prepared to show up in big numbers to say NO Certificate of Public Good! Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off



gay cam models asians247 castingcouchhd dadcreep homoemo webcam strip ladyboy cams missionary boys castingcouch-hd dating sites reviews vr porn sites germangoogirls